Tracking expert predictions on the effects of artificial intelligence on science

Beyond Bold Predictions: The Many Views on AI's Future

Forecasts about AI and its impact—on jobs, science, our lives—influence our thinking and policies today. A few bold predictions tend to dominate headlines, but these represent only a fraction of expert views on the future of AI. Understanding the full range of expert predictions can help make policy that is grounded in the best evidence about the future of AI and its impact.

LEAP operates on three key principles:

  • Accountability: LEAP forecasts are detailed and verifiable, encouraging disciplined thinking and allowing us to track whose predictions prove most accurate.
  • The wisdom of well-chosen crowds: LEAP emphasizes diversity of perspective and rewards calibration and timeliness of forecasts.
  • Decision relevance: LEAP questions are designed to elicit policy-relevant forecasts, helping decision-makers plan for likely futures across domains.

We also ask our experts to explain the reasoning behind their forecasts. In the first three months of LEAP, experts wrote over a million words of rationales explaining their predictions. Sample rationales include:

"Medicine shows the most rapid uptake, fueled by the pervasive use of AI in medical imaging, diagnostic algorithms, and clinical decision support systems. The scale of healthcare data, regulatory momentum, and demand for translational applications all reinforce this trajectory, positioning medicine as the leading non-CS discipline for explicit AI engagement by 2030. In physics, the diffusion of AI is proceeding steadily but at a more measured pace, with growth concentrated in data-intensive areas such as astrophysics, particle physics, and large-scale simulations. These subfields generate massive experimental datasets that benefit from AI methods, but much of the broader discipline remains oriented around theory-driven inquiry, moderating the overall rate of adoption."
"Historically, human labor patterns have experienced quite radical transformations over time, even in established sectors. Emerging technologies, rather than sucking people out of the labor market of white-collar work, are more likely to make them work differently and lead to new white-collar roles that can capitalize on this transition."
"A paradox exists for the creating-music and writing-novels thresholds: by definition the exceptional must be rare, but if an AI could write one novel as good as the best in 2025, it could likely write thousands, rendering all of them unexceptional and thus devoid of personality."
"Some of the [Millennium Prize] problems, like the Riemann Hypothesis or the Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer Conjecture, are especially well-suited to AI-supported exploration. They bear a kind of family resemblance to the Four-Color Theorem in their relationship to computer-assisted mathematics. The Four-Color Theorem was famously solved through a hybrid of human conceptual framing and extensive computer verification. As Donald MacKenzie details in his socio-history of that episode, much of the intellectual labor wasn't in the computation itself but in formalizing the problem in a way that machines could meaningfully engage with it and in managing the institutional consequences of proof-by-machine."
"Challenges in reasoning and inter-system collaboration are matters of scaffolding and context and I expect both—especially collaboration—to become much more robust in the coming years. Embodiment will advance as robotics grows and simulated world models improve, driven by greater availability of training data. In contrast, challenges such as memory, hallucination, and generalization are more deeply tied to underlying architectural limitations, making them persistently difficult to overcome."
"While adoption rates among knowledge workers may continue to grow rapidly, a substantial portion of the U.S. workforce performs tasks that are inherently unsuitable for generative AI assistance in its current or foreseeable form. Manual labor sectors including construction, manufacturing assembly, and maintenance require physical presence and manipulation of objects. Direct service work such as food service, retail, healthcare aides, and childcare depends on human interaction and physical tasks. Transportation and logistics, skilled trades like plumbing and electrical work, agriculture, and direct patient care in healthcare all involve work that generative AI cannot meaningfully assist."
"I would expect an increasing proportion of adults, even if not deliberately seeking AI interaction for companionship, drifting into the habit of conversations with AI systems and allowing themselves to suspend disbelief and conceptualise these conversations as interactions with human companions. This proportion will increase rapidly as children grow to adulthood accepting these conversations as natural, having known interactive systems like Siri and Alexa for all of their conscious lives."
"Access to clean, unbiased, legally usable, and domain-specific datasets remains the single greatest obstacle to scalable adoption. Despite larger models and better architectures, progress will continue to be throttled by privacy constraints, copyright uncertainty, and the scarcity of trustworthy labeled data for specialized sectors such as healthcare, defense, and finance."

These rationales enable us to understand why people hold the beliefs they do, and where different groups diverge from one another. Over time, LEAP can help shift the AI debate from “who sounds most confident?” to “whose predictions, scored over years, help us make more informed choices?”